🔗 Share this article

I have some thoughts regarding that comments delivered by ESPN broadcaster a well-known announcer after the Serbian champion's win over Taylor Fritz during the US Open last eight. Consider – Fritz is the United States, the commentator is from the US – and athletic competitions often encourage patriotic sentiment. Some disappointment was appropriate. Instead, Fowler brought up the continued absence of American men at the majors: not one of them had lifted a title since the last American champion in 2003, and he had been the final representative in the tournament.

Everyone love a narrative, myself included. But come on. Suppose Fritz defeated the legend for the first time, phenomenal talent Carlos Alcaraz was looming in the following match, who he has yet to beat in an official match. And had he someway survived that, it would have been title holder the Italian, versus him Fritz had lost 10 of the previous eleven sets. The two young stars had also divided the previous seven major titles (plus the Spaniard went on to defeat a fatigued Djokovic in the next round). Fritz said in press following his defeat that he actually liked his path, because it presented the opportunity to defeat the three best players in the sport in succession. Fritz is well justified to aim for the accomplishment; an athlete is meant to believe in themselves. But entering that Serbian last eight match who else in their right mind had the drought of American champions on the brain?

Coco Gauff’s weaker delivery the sole barrier between her and sustained success

Fritz, 28, is placed fourth in the global rankings entering the upcoming ATP World Tour Finals and has won his previous six encounters over No 3 Alexander Zverev with increasing ease. Presumably he could claim that position for himself in the coming years. But evidently that at present, that’s as high as he can rise: The Italian and Spaniard lie a vast gap of ranking points away. Fritz’s top-class serve and powerful strength on both forehand and reverse side are more than enough to defeat the majority of opponents on the ATP tour. When facing the handful of generational talents, though, Fritz is frequently helpless. The past few seasons has seen the interesting rise of lanky, towering players who can nonetheless move around with the alarming speed and fluidity of smaller men. He is six-foot-five and appears that way. His footwork is rigid, as if he’s still getting used to his limbs. So he seldom steal a point that the opponent was controlling, and hitting a drop shot against him is usually a reliable tactic. That serves as a pretty harsh restriction on his potential.

The American has made a number of dramatic, improbable improvements throughout his career. Early on of the ten-year period, he was circling the bottom of the world's best thirty. 24 months later, he was sniffing the elite ten. The previous season, he suddenly surged up to fourth place – and maintained the spot. But the subsequent step, competing against and defeating all-time-greats like Alcaraz, the Italian, and even a aging Djokovic, is the toughest of all. What could Fowler have been thinking? That Fritz, in 2025, was a legitimate contender to beat them all back-to-back? That it was appropriate commenting on the continuing drought of American men lifting grand slams when he had exited the New York major in the quarter-finals? The desperation is simply excessive and the appreciation for the difficulty of the task insufficient.

The American star achieved a personal best run to the Wimbledon last four in the summer.

Fritz’s play in that very quarter-final ought to have been sufficient of an indication. The Serbian triumphed in four rounds, a victory that only felt uncertain for brief periods towards the very end, when Fritz had survived a couple match points and had a chance to maintain serve for 5-5. The duo looked well-balanced during the rallies, with the American earning numerous chances to win the opponent's serve. But Djokovic saved break point after break point, extending the run to the point of frustration. When Fritz finally did claim a single of the opportunities at 5-5 in the middle stanza, he immediately played a terrible game to lose his own serve once more; the Serbian had drawn him into a skirmish peripheral to the main contest and forced him to use excessive effort to prevail. Facing match points in the final game, his primary delivery floated to the sky. He prolonged the contest twice on his backup delivery, but finally committed two errors. It was not a collapse, in my opinion, only a consequence of having to hit too many second serves.

The match was quite compelling proof that Fritz is insufficiently skilled to beat any version of Djokovic, who lost to Alcaraz in the next round and did not especially seem like he believed he could triumph. This is absolutely acceptable – Djokovic is the greatest of all time, and may not be at the peak of his physical powers now, but has developed sufficient knowledge and strategic intelligence to compensate for a significant portion of the drop-off. The issue is the individuals who were expecting the American to win, and putting pressure on him to achieve that, when he was yet to accomplished anything that suggested he could.

The American is an valuable contributor to the circuit regardless. He’s a patient, thoughtful voice in media sessions, exceeding almost everyone on the ATP aside from the Russian star, willing to not just express his emotions or the tactic he felt determined a contest, but explain it. That he should shoulder the majority of the blame for the United States not spawn a male major champion since the last American titlist seems unjust. (Since the fellow American is rubbing shoulders with him in the standings, maybe they can divide that burden.)

Year-End Championships: Singles Groups

Jimmy Connors Group

• The Spanish phenom
• The American contender
• Alex de Minaur (Aus)
• Lorenzo Musetti (It)

Bjorn Borg Division

• Jannik Sinner (It)
• The German powerhouse
• Ben Shelton (US)
• Félix Auger-Aliassime (Can)

“I’d probably dwell on it forever if I fail to do it,” the American informed a journalist in June of winning a grand slam. It is hoped he understands that he’s not a failure if he does not achieve that goal, that overcoming Alcaraz and Sinner’s dominant, formidable reign is actually extremely unlikely for all other players. {