🔗 Share this article

The Life Cycle of a Movement can be marked by specific steps.

1. The Big Idea

A charismatic leader or figureheads present a new and transcendent idea pledging a solution for disconnected individuals.

And so it goes. They’re getting ready to confront the system down in Brisbane. Pressure is mounting. Smoke is rising from the sidelines. One individual, naked, anxious, the slogan POSITIVE INTENT displayed prominently in chicken blood, has come staggering into view and is taken aside with discretion for a temporary assignment elsewhere.

Do you ever miss the start, when everything was fresh? The era of early Bazball, of uninhibited aggression.

2. The Honeymoon Phase

Cult leaders guarantee a reboot, a brighter tomorrow, support, success within a community who all believe in the method.

How did it feel back then? A team united basking in glory. Body art. Strength. Jawlines. Elite male wellness energy. Admittedly, England’s players will claim it’s not a real term, amusingly as it’s denied, what was that spectacle?

However, everyone understands the concept. It’s Harry Brook attempting a move so unconventional it has to be pixelated. It’s the excitement of the captain in his final form, an expression conveying: focused titan, beard made of wood, natural look, genuinely raw you wouldn’t be surprised to look down and notice he’s fielding at mid-off shirtless embracing nature.

It’s Ben Duckett often seen speaking publicly, resembling a cheerful animal formally attired, uttering phrases such as we are actively deconstructing the orange. And yes, the energy, for a significant period, was only good energy.

3. A New Life

Growth phase. Unity enforced through repetition of key phrases. These beliefs can appear contradictory as a loyalty check.

Am I alone? The criticism, the outrage, the sense of betrayal post-defeat feels overblown, overdone. The batting collapsed on the field, as they often do in Australia. They were torn apart defensively for a couple of hours when tactics failed, carved around by Travis Head batting like England but better, responsive to the situation, an athlete shining with brilliance.

Now there is the criticism, the frustration, the perception of the team as a failure. The consensus is that losing isn’t enough, they need to lose righteously, to be scoured, flame-throwered, destroyed through sheer skill of the bowler’s action, the simple basics of the bowler, marking his wickets with a bashful smile as if receiving a pleasant gift. How will they respond?

4. External Conflict

Challenges surface due to setbacks. Yet, mistakes are denied. It starts to feed on anger towards critics.

The fact remains, approaching from the second Test, we’ve entered a delicious point of tension in the story of this movement. England could quite easily win in the next Test in a blur of adrenal disruption. Probably, defeat could come swiftly. In case of defeat it appears we could be witnessing the decline.

Prior to that, a couple of points to consider regarding this. Previously, at the start, of passion and hope, a column appeared calling it a phenomenon. Criticism followed, which demonstrated because everyone knows how to confirm lack of cult status is if supporters send hundreds of furiously one-eyed messages denying scrutiny of its truths.

What has happened in the last few days is just as interesting. It seems that hating Bazball has turned into a movement. Online outrage is widespread, disappointed commentators, shots of angry middle-aged travelling fans missing out on play, like a room full of timeshare owners seeking justice.

On the other hand, there is the broader context of Australia’s more nuanced ingrained annoyance at these weirdly passive-aggressive buccaneers, stating, your cherished traditions and have fostered and nurtured to distinguish yourselves from others, well, it’s all a bit of a gag in the end old boy.

This is the core issue. Everything is a cult. Bazball was a cult since the sport itself is insular. Or rather, English cricket has always been a cult, a group, a garden party, a closed world with a long history of tradition and mystery supporting it. This has always been where entry is limited. It’s the colonial game of England, the pioneering brand. And notably, Britain is itself a cult, a structure of hidden ranks, a place that literally still has a king.

England’s cricketers have been enclosed in this system since childhood. Attempting to break free, to foster positivity, they are simply replicating their upbringing, forming a new circle, a limited community, however with a new team and a coach encouraging individuality if you fit the mold.

Live where your feet are. Embrace challenges. Despite efforts, you’re always basically in the same place.

Reflecting on this, it is perhaps the moment to show understanding for the movement, to recognize its positives, of which there are many. How to define it? Creating a sense of freedom. Challenging orthodoxies. Batting aggressively|Attacking with